North American Cockapoo Registy Information on Cockapoo Genetics

        Cockapoos are considered 1st generation (F1) if the parents are pure cockers and pure poodle. Cockapoo to Cockapoo is 2nd generation (F2) and progressing F2 to F2 begets F3 - etc.  For recording purposes we take the lowest F factor to 'label' the progeny. Thus and F6 to and F2 would be considered an F3.  They are still cockapoos as long as the origin was 1/2 cocker and 1/2 poodle and nothing else has been mixed in along the way, and it stays cockapoo to cockapoo without adding back in any poodle or cocker.

        A cockapoo bred back to a poodle while a nice dog is no longer a true cockapoo.  Some term this cockapoo-poo.  A few breeders may have this breeding as they do not have a pair of cockapoos. They are encouraged to get the proper dogs for breeding. Some breeders try to pass these off as 2nd generation - this is an out right falsehood.  Some breeders try to con folks into thinking it is a better cross as more of the pups will be non shed - another falsehood.  Cockapoos by their very nature are low to non shed and low to non doggy odor. The poodle coat has a great deal of dominance making it the ideal cross with the cocker.

        If the breeder picking the dogs to be used for 2nd generation is careful to pick breeding stock that shows very much the characteristics of both then this look can be maintained. Let's say a breeder prefers a more poodle like look and keeps those for breeding. If this same breeder keeps more pups and continues the same practice after a few generations the cocker input could be eliminated to have reverted back to a poodle - thus negating the whole ideal of the
cockapoo.  Conversely if a breeder stays on middle ground while eliminating any faults that evidence themselves ( i.e. an overbite ) then the cockapoo could be established and breeding true with very little throwback to the original breeds.

        Simple medallion pea theory would have us think that ½ cocker and ½ poodles for F1 the cockapoo bred together would produce ¼ cockers ¼ poodles ¼ cockapoo and ¼ cockapoo in 2nd generation (F2). This is not the case given the prepotency of factors involved.  A simplistic view would be to toss 120 black marbles in a pot and 120 white marbles. Then one draws 120 marbles out to create the new pup. Perfect statistics would have us at 50% from each - also unlikely. However 55% is reasonable - so cockapoos show the characteristics of each nicely.  The likelihood of having 25% of the marbles being one color to create a ¾ cocker ¼ poodle and the looks with higher potential to shedding is very unlikely much less having a drawing of enough to create a pup that looks almost identical to a cocker or poodle. There are many others factors involved such as recessives where both parents contribute a rare gene and it has to be picked up from both parents, and things that are linked like certain eye colors to coat colors.

        Cockapoos will almost always show strong characteristics of both parents. They could lean a little to poodle or a little to cocker. Some may be a little curlier and some may have blockier heads but they definitely show characteristics of both parents in a unique way that is what gives cockapoos such a special look.  It is highly unlikely they would inherit a predominance of genes from either parent.  Second generation has the highest incidence of pups that will lean more to
the looks of either parent breed. We contribute this to the grandfather effect. A man may have a full head of hair until he dies while his dad was bald by 40.  The son very often inherits this tendency of the grandfather. Dogs have this tendency too. This does not make 2nd generation bad and by no means expect all the pups or even one in a litter to have the throwback - just something to be aware of.  The breeder should have a good idea by coat type well before the pups leave for their new homes. By 3rd generation very few if any throwbacks are seen just as in 1st generation and 4th generation on this almost never happens.


Click to enter NACR site if you came from a search engine
Last updated 10/04  © Inclusive from 1999, NACR.